Guns Are A Controversial Topic - 1397 Words

Guns are a very controversial topic for almost all people. There is a good amount of people who are progun, for reasons such as self-defense, hunting, and so on. There is also a good amount of people who are antigun, for reasons such as they kill people, they are dangerous, and so on. The people who own them, view guns as tools or toys, vs. the people who are scared of them, view them as killing machines. There are many different views, thoughts, and opinions on guns, but there is only one that is right. In â€Å"Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns† by Molly Ivins, the author is antigun. She claims to be proknife, which is very interesting seeing as a good portion of the reason why people are antigun is because guns kill people and you†¦show more content†¦t This making her point here not make sense, because if the point was to cause less murders and attacks it would not be very effective. It would be a better, more effective, idea for her to have been anti gu n and anit knife, so basically anit weapon. Molly Ivins claims to take what the second amendment says literally, but she does not do this very well. The second amendment says, â€Å"A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed†(qtd in Ivins323). Notice it says nothing about the people who own guns having to be part of the well-regulated militia, which she claims here, â€Å"It says quite clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia, that is, the armed force, including the National Guard.†(Ivins324). The amendment truly just says that in order to have a militia people must have the right to own guns, which is something the author does not include in her interpretation. Where she was going with her interpretation can be seen and it does make sense in a way, but in the end it just seems like she made it so it fit here viewpoint. Ivins also say, â€Å"Fourteen-year-old boys are not part of a well-regulated militia.†(Ivins323). This should not even be included, because of the fact that fourteen-year-old boys cannot even legally own guns. This means that they would have gotten them illegaly, so if